SQ Week 7
[22tm] The class interpreted Yu’s diligence at regulating the floods in terms of his shame that his father, Kun, had not been successful as a hydraulics engineer. In the text, there is nothing about shame: “Yu was saddened that the work of his deceased father . . . was unsuccessful and that Kun had been punished for this.” If there is anything we should have learned from reading Sima Qian, it is that filial piety does not allow one to feel “shame” for one’s parents or ancestors. The man who employed Yu was Shun, the very epitome of filial piety. Shun’s parents and brother were always trying to kill him, and yet when they needed him, he was always there, surrounding them with filial love [8m, 11-12]. Yao recognized Shun’s worthiness, and Shun in turn recognized Yu’s virtues. Shun did not hold the father’s incompetence against Yu, and would certainly have recognized lapses of filial piety on Yu’s part. I see no shame: Yu work...